<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Tip: don&#8217;t use links with JavaScript unless the link goes some where</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/07/09/quick-tip-dont-use-links-with-javascript-unless-the-link-goes-some-where/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/07/09/quick-tip-dont-use-links-with-javascript-unless-the-link-goes-some-where/</link>
	<description>Javascript and other web programming topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/07/09/quick-tip-dont-use-links-with-javascript-unless-the-link-goes-some-where/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetvision.com/?p=121#comment-87</guid>
		<description>@Paul I agree with you when it is an anchor, as it indeed goes some where.  I am not sure that I agree with the &quot;tabs or  sliders&quot; bit.  Could you expand on how a link is more useful in the case of a tab or slider than say a  or ?  I have run into so many situations where a link with just a hash and some JavaScript ends up scrolling the page to the top of the page, there by taking the user away from the control they were interacting with.  A specific case was a control that had been working fine until IE8 came out, and something about the JS, the HTML and IE8 made it follow the anchor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul I agree with you when it is an anchor, as it indeed goes some where.  I am not sure that I agree with the &#8220;tabs or  sliders&#8221; bit.  Could you expand on how a link is more useful in the case of a tab or slider than say a  or ?  I have run into so many situations where a link with just a hash and some JavaScript ends up scrolling the page to the top of the page, there by taking the user away from the control they were interacting with.  A specific case was a control that had been working fine until IE8 came out, and something about the JS, the HTML and IE8 made it follow the anchor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/07/09/quick-tip-dont-use-links-with-javascript-unless-the-link-goes-some-where/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetvision.com/?p=121#comment-86</guid>
		<description>While I totally agree with you in principal, links also cause actions on pages (namely, moving to named anchors). Similarly, they can be used to move content, like tabs or sliders. For those instances, links with a bit of javascript aid makes sense. Where they don&#039;t make sense is wrapping a button image in an &lt;a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I totally agree with you in principal, links also cause actions on pages (namely, moving to named anchors). Similarly, they can be used to move content, like tabs or sliders. For those instances, links with a bit of javascript aid makes sense. Where they don&#8217;t make sense is wrapping a button image in an <a>.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
