<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The one real reason to not use JQuery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/02/02/the-one-real-reason-to-not-use-jquery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/02/02/the-one-real-reason-to-not-use-jquery/</link>
	<description>Javascript and other web programming topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seasoup</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/02/02/the-one-real-reason-to-not-use-jquery/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>seasoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/02/02/the-one-real-reason-to-not-use-jquery/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>jQuery plugins address some of these concerns.  Not every project requires class-object oriented development, especially since javascript is a prototype based object oriented language.   I think jQuery maintains it&#039;s core with what will be used the most.  Here are two plugins.  I&#039;ve implemented the first one before, the second one is developed by one of jQuery&#039;s core contributors.

http://code.google.com/p/jquery-klass/

http://flesler.blogspot.com/2008/06/jsclass.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jQuery plugins address some of these concerns.  Not every project requires class-object oriented development, especially since javascript is a prototype based object oriented language.   I think jQuery maintains it&#8217;s core with what will be used the most.  Here are two plugins.  I&#8217;ve implemented the first one before, the second one is developed by one of jQuery&#8217;s core contributors.</p>
<p><a href="http://code.google.com/p/jquery-klass/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/jquery-klass/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://flesler.blogspot.com/2008/06/jsclass.html" rel="nofollow">http://flesler.blogspot.com/2008/06/jsclass.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three real good reasons to use JQuery, from a Mootools lover &#124; sweetvision</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/02/02/the-one-real-reason-to-not-use-jquery/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Three real good reasons to use JQuery, from a Mootools lover &#124; sweetvision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetvision.com/2009/02/02/the-one-real-reason-to-not-use-jquery/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>[...] have done a little more playing around with JQuery and have found one major draw back when compared to Mootools      Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have done a little more playing around with JQuery and have found one major draw back when compared to Mootools      Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
